The Covid-19 relief bill passed by the Senate on Saturday, a $1.9 trillion package modeled after a plan by President Biden, includes provisions favored by a range of industry and advocacy groups. Mr. Biden’s plan has also had broad support from the public.
Some groups who praised the package said even more aid would be necessary. Others expressed concern about the size of the bill, saying it should have been more narrowly targeted toward the greatest needs. Republicans in Congress, who overwhelmingly opposed the plan, were among those who cited concerns that such a large package could overheat the economy.
Praised the bill
Business
Said the Payroll Support Program was vital to preserving airline jobs.
Business
Called the Restaurant Revitalization Fund “an incredible step forward.”
Civil rights
Praised the bill for including Latinos “more fully than previous relief packages.”
Health care
Praised funding for mental health services for children and adolescents added in the Senate.
Health care
Favored Mr. Biden’s version of the bill, which included an increase to the minimum wage.
Said more would be needed
Agriculture
Called for maintaining increased food stamp benefits during the downturn and for more commodity purchases for food banks.
Business
Said hotels would need additional support.
Business
Called for “a permanent, comprehensive, sustainable paid leave program.”
Business
Called for extending the Paycheck Protection Program application deadline and allowing a third draw on loans.
Health care
Called for more support through the Provider Relief Fund.
Health care
Called for additional relief for teaching hospitals, faculty physicians and research enterprises.
Nonprofits
Called for extending the Paycheck Protection Program application deadline, expanding coverage of unemployment costs charged to nonprofits and expanding the charitable tax deduction.
Preferred smaller bill
Business
“The package should be more targeted to prioritize immediate public health needs and emergency economic assistance.”
Business
Called for “more targeted” revisions, including for state and local direct aid.
Fiscal watchdog
Said the package could be better targeted and called for limiting state and local direct aid and for removing “unrelated political objectives,” among other changes.